On challenging atheism
On challenging atheism
Below is a set of questions to challenge your thinking on theology and the question of god (generally the Abrahamic God).
- If absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, how do you justify making a positive claim that God does not exist?
- Can you name one thing in philosophy or science that we consider real that we can’t directly observe, and why do you accept it but not God?
- Is it possible that our cognitive faculties, which evolved for survival not truth, are simply unequipped to detect or comprehend God?
- You argue that the universe doesn’t require a creator. But can you explain why something exists rather than nothing, without appealing to metaphysical assumptions?
- Do you believe in objective morality? If so, what’s its grounding without a transcendent source?
- You criticize the concept of God for being incoherent or contradictory. But can you articulate the most sophisticated version of God ever proposed?
- Who was Anselm and what is the ontological argument? Can you accurately summarize it and its strongest rebuttal?
- Do you know what the Kalam Cosmological Argument is, and can you explain why it fails—without misrepresenting it?
- Can you name a major philosopher of religion from the last 50 years who was an atheist, and how their view differed from New Atheists like Dawkins or Hitchens?
- If tomorrow a being appeared with the ability to alter time, read thoughts, and resurrect the dead—would that be God to you? If not, what would be?
- Would you agree that many scientific theories were once thought absurd but later confirmed? Why not apply the same humility to metaphysical claims about God?
- If consciousness can arise from material processes, what’s the material explanation for intentionality, qualia, and first-person experience—and how do you know it’s the only possible explanation?

